Premature Conclusions About Psychotherapy for Dysthymia

See the reply

Premature Conclusions About Psychotherapy for Dysthymia

To the Editor: In their meta-analysis of 30 randomized trials of treatments for adult major depression, Cuijpers et al1 concluded that pharmacotherapy was more efficacious than psychotherapy for dysthymia. A meta-analysis by Imel et al2 reached similar conclusions, but another by Pinquart et al3 on later-life depression reported that pharmacotherapy was less effective than psychotherapy for dysthymia. The strength of conclusions derived from meta-analyses stems directly from the quality and quantity of data available to address the research question. Unfortunately, the scientific literature on comparative trials of psychotherapy for dysthymia is not well enough established at this point to answer this question.

Cuijpers and colleagues’ conclusion about psychotherapy for dysthymic patients was based on just 5 clinical trials of psychological interventions that differed in content, length, and treatment setting. Two trials4,5 compared problem-solving therapy (PST) versus paroxetine for primary care patients with dysthymia. Psychotherapy in these trials consisted of just 4 to 6 sessions of PST delivered for 30 minutes each using a highly structured protocol that quite likely does not generalize well to psychotherapy delivered in the community. In the Williams et al4 study, patients receiving PST showed an increasing rate of improvement over the course of the 11-week trial. Thus, the length or frequency of PST may not have been adequate to determine its full benefits. Furthermore, as most primary care patients report a treatment preference for psychotherapy over antidepressants,6 medication trials in these settings may suffer from sample selection bias.

Two other trials7,8 reported that interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) was significantly less effective than sertraline at posttreatment. The poorer outcomes for IPT may stem from the fact that IPT was originally designed for acute depressive illness and may require further adaptation for chronically depressed patients.8 The last trial9 included in the meta-analysis was the only one of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for dysthymia. Although the sample size was small and differences were not significant, retention in the CBT condition was 91% versus only 67% in the medication condition. If nonresponders are more likely than responders to drop out, the higher discontinuation rate in the medication arm may have made this condition appear more efficacious than it actually was.

Previous reports suggest that psychotherapy for dysthymia may require a greater number of sessions than typically used in acute depression treatment and specific adaptation for chronic illness.10 Adapted CBT appears effective: in another large trial,11 the cognitive-behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy for chronic depression was found to be as effective as medication alone for patients with co-occurring major depression and dysthymia.

A more appropriate interpretation of the evidence to date is that comprehensive CBT adapted for chronic depression is a promising treatment for dysthymia and that brief psychotherapy or IPT specifically may be less effective than antidepressants during acute treatment. Further research is needed to determine the efficacy of different types of psychotherapy versus antidepressants for dysthymia, especially for longer-term outcomes. Until such trials are conducted, meta-analyses of these data are premature, and definitive conclusions about the efficacy of "psychotherapy" for dysthymia appear unwarranted.

References

1. Cuijpers P, van Straten A, van Oppen P, et al. Are psychological and pharmacologic interventions equally effective in the treatment of adult depressive disorders? a meta-analysis of comparative studies. J Clin Psychiatry. 2008;69(11):1675-1685. PubMed

2. Imel ZE, Malterer MB, McKay KM, et al. A meta-analysis of psychotherapy and medication in unipolar depression and dysthymia. J Affect Disord. 2008;110(3):197-206. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.jad.2008.03.018

3. Pinquart M, Duberstein PR, Lyness JM. Treatments for later-life depressive conditions: a meta-analytic comparison of pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163(9):1493-1501. PubMed doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.163.9.1493

4. Williams JW Jr, Barrett J, Oxman T, et al. Treatment of dysthymia and minor depression in primary care: a randomized controlled trial in older adults. JAMA. 2000;284(12):1519-1526. PubMed doi:10.1001/jama.284.12.1519

5. Barrett JE, Williams JW Jr, Oxman TE, et al. Treatment of dysthymia and minor depression in primary care: a randomized trial in patients aged 18 to 59 years. J Fam Pract. 2001;50(5):405-412. PubMed

6. Backenstrass M, Joest K, Frank A, et al. Preferences for treatment in primary care: a comparison of nondepressive, subsyndromal and major depressive patients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2006;28(2):178-180. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2005.10.001

7. Browne G, Steiner M, Roberts J, et al. Sertraline and/or interpersonal psychotherapy for patients with dysthymic disorder in primary care: 6-month comparison with longitudinal 2-year follow-up of effectiveness and costs. J Affect Disord. 2002;68(2-3):317-330. PubMed doi:10.1016/S0165-0327(01)00343-3

8. Markowitz JC, Kocsis JH, Bleiberg KL, et al. A comparative trial of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy for "pure" dysthymic patients. J Affect Disord. 2005;89(1-3):167-175. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.jad.2005.10.001

9. Dunner DL, Schmaling KB, Hendrickson H, et al. Cognitive therapy versus fluoxetine in the treatment of dysthymic disorder. Depression. 1996;4(1):34-41. PubMed doi:10.1002/(SICI)1522-7162(1996)4:1<34::AID-DEPR4>3.0.CO;2-F

10. McCullough JP. Psychotherapy for dysthymia: a naturalistic study of ten patients. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1991;179(12):734-740. PubMed doi:10.1097/00005053-199112000-00004

11. Keller MB, McCullough JP, Klein DN, et al. A comparison of nefazodone, the cognitive behavioral-analysis system of psychotherapy, and their combination for the treatment of chronic depression. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(20):1462-1470. PubMed doi:10.1056/NEJM200005183422001

Brandon A. Gaudiano, PhD

[email protected]

Lisa A. Uebelacker, PhD

Gary Epstein-Lubow, MD

Ivan W. Miller, PhD

Author affiliations: Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Psychosocial Research Program, Butler Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island. Financial disclosure: None reported. Funding/support: None reported.

doi:10.4088/JCP.09lr05075

© Copyright 2009 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.