psychiatrist

This work may not be copied, distributed, displayed, published, reproduced, transmitted, modified, posted, sold, licensed, or used for commercial purposes. By downloading this file, you are agreeing to the publisher’s Terms & Conditions.

Commentary

Recent Advances in Screening for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer Disease

Allan Anderson, MD,a and Matthew Malone, DO, MBAa

Published: December 26, 2022

Abstract

In recent years, scientific understanding of the pathophysiology underlying Alzheimer disease (AD) has advanced substantially. Among the most transformative of discoveries is the existence of biomarkers, such as Aβ42, which can manifest in the central nervous system decades before the onset of disease-associated dementia. By detecting these biological entities early, clinicians can close diagnostic delays and substantially improve outcomes for patients with AD. With prompt news of a diagnosis, patients can initiate long-term planning and devise goals for treatment while their cognition is relatively intact. To differentiate among different forms of dementia, neurologists and supporting clinicians should additionally capitalize on the availability of validated screening tools. Increasingly adopted, tests such as the Montreal Cognitive Assessment yield highly sensitive, specific findings that can improve the standard of care. These results, when paired with insights gleaned from patient histories and clinical examinations, can further inform treatment-decision making and help ensure that patients receive care tailored to their unique circumstances and needs.


J Clin Psychiatry 2023;84(1):BG21120COM3
To cite: Anderson A, Malone M. Recent advances in screening for mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease. J Clin Psychiatry. 2023;84(1):BG21120COM3
To share: https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.BG21120COM3
© Copyright 2022 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.

aBanner Alzheimer’s Institute, Tucson, Arizona


More than 6 million Americans1 are living with Alzheimer disease (AD), and that number is expected to reach 13 million by 2050.1 One in every 3 seniors dies with AD or another dementia, and AD kills more than breast cancer and prostate cancer combined.1 AD accounts for 60%–80% of all dementias,2,3 often overlapping with other pathologies including Lewy body dementia, vascular dementia, and hippocampal sclerosis. It is estimated that more than 11 million family caregivers1 provide around 16 billion hours in unpaid care, valued at nearly $272 billion.1 Total health care costs for people with Alzheimer and other dementias are expected to increase from $321 billion in 2022 to close to $1 trillion1 in 2050.

Within the last decade, scientists have discovered that certain biomarkers can be detected decades before the onset of AD symptoms,4 resulting in earlier diagnoses and interventions. Notable biomarkers include amyloid β (Aβ42), total tau (t-tau), and phosphorylated tau (p-tau).5 Aβ42 in the brain signals the production of tau, which causes the neuronal damage and synaptic dysfunction underlying AD.6

Early detection of these biomarkers can lead to early intervention and better patient outcomes. Through education, patients and families can gain a better understanding of the symptoms and changes that occur with AD and what the impact of the disease might be for them. With the time gained from faster diagnoses, patients with AD should discuss their treatment plan goals with their clinicians and weigh the risks and benefits of different treatment strategies together. Lifestyle interventions, financial planning, and seeking support services are additional benefits to an early diagnosis.7

Differentiating between stages and types of dementia is an important step in optimizing patient outcomes, including the understanding that mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is not dementia.7 MCI is characterized by the patient or the patient’s family or caregivers reporting changes in cognitive ability, without any major change in activities of daily living (although compensatory measures may be present), no explanation from psychiatric disorders, and objective evidence of cognitive impairment on a clinical examination.8

Several screening methods are available to differentiate among forms of dementia. The Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) is the most common cognitive screening test. It is well-established and sensitive to memory disorders specifically. The MMSE consists of 11 questions, takes approximately 10 minutes to complete, and is easy to administer.9

The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is also becoming more widely adopted. Like the MMSE, MoCA takes around 10 minutes and consists of a 1-page document that uses a 30-point scale to assess memory, reasoning, and executive functioning.10 The MoCA can include the Memory Index Subscale (MIS), which calculates points for word recall in free recall, category prompts, and multiple choice. If total MoCA score is less than 20 and patients score less than 7 out of 15 on the MIS, the risk for progressing from MCI to AD increases by 60% in the next year.11 If the total MoCA score is > 20 and the MIS is > 7, then the risk for progressing from MCI to dementia is less than 35%. The MoCA is 90% sensitive and 87% specific for MCI.10,11

Other tests used to screen for dementia include the Saint Louis University Mental Status Exam (SLUMS), the General Practitioner Assessment of Cognition (GPCOG), and the Mini-Cog.12–14

It is important for clinicians to include patient history and physical and neurologic examinations in their assessments to rule out AD mimics, such as psychiatric illnesses, neurologic disorders, or metabolic changes. By capitalizing on the rapidly improving understanding of AD pathophysiology, clinicians should be better able to identify dementia, intervene appropriately, and ultimately improve patient outcomes.

Published online: December 26, 2022.

Unlabeled and investigational usage: The faculty of this educational activity may include discussions of products or devices that are not currently labeled for use by the FDA. Faculty members have been advised to disclose to the audience any reference to an unlabeled or investigational use. No endorsement of unapproved products or uses is made or implied by coverage of these products or uses. Please refer to the official prescribing information for each product for discussion of approved indicators, contraindications and warnings.

This CME activity is expired. For more CME activities, visit CMEInstitute.com.
Find more articles on this and other psychiatry and CNS topics:
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
The Primary Care Companion for CNS Disorders

 

CME Background Information

Articles are selected for credit designation based on an assessment of the educational needs of CME participants, with the purpose of providing readers with a curriculum of CME articles on a variety of topics throughout each volume. Activities are planned using a process that links identified needs with desired results.

To obtain credit, read the article, correctly answer the questions in the Posttest, and complete the Evaluation.

This Commentary section of The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry presents the highlights of the teleconference series “Screening, Diagnosing, and Treating Mild Cognitive Impairment and Mild Alzheimer Disease,” which was held on February 25, 2022. This report was prepared and independently developed by the CME Institute of Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc., and was supported by an educational grant from Biogen MA Inc.

The teleconference was chaired by Dr Allan Anderson, MD, MMM, CMD, DLFAPA, Banner Alzheimer’s Institute, Tucson, Arizona. The faculty was Dr Matthew Malone, DO, MBA, Banner Alzheimer’s Institute, Tucson, Arizona.

CME Objective

After completing this educational activity, you should be able to:

  • Diagnose patients with mild cognitive impairment or mild Alzheimer dementia
  • Facilitate prompt treatment initiation for patients with mild cognitive impairment or mild Alzheimer dementia

Accreditation Statement

The CME Institute of Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc., is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

Release, Review, and Expiration Dates

This Neuroscience Commentary activity was published in December 2022 and is eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 Credit through December 31, 2023. The latest review of this material was September 2022.

Financial Disclosure

The CME Institute adheres to the Standards for Integrity and Independence in Accredited Continuing Education of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME). Any individuals in a position to control the content of a continuing education activity, including faculty, content developers, reviewers, staff, and others, are required to disclose to learners the presence or absence of any relevant financial relationships with an ACCME-defined ineligible company within the preceding 24 months of the activity. The ACCME defines an “ineligible company” as one whose primary business is producing, marketing, selling, re-selling, or distributing healthcare products used by or on patients.

The CME Institute has mitigated all relevant conflicts of interest prior to the commencement of the activity. None of the individuals involved in the content have relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies except the following:

Marlene P. Freeman, MD, Editor in Chief, Boston, Massachusetts, has received research funding from JayMac and Sage; has been a member of the Independent Data Safety and Monitoring Committee for Janssen (Johnson & Johnson), Novartis, and Neurocrine; and has served on advisory boards for Eliem and Sage. As an employee of Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Dr Freeman works with the MGH National Pregnancy Registry, which receives funding from Alkermes, Aurobindo, AuroMedics, Johnson & Johnson/Janssen, Otsuka, Sage, Sunovion, Supernus, and Teva, and works with the MGH Clinical Trials Network and Institute, which receives research funding from multiple pharmaceutical companies and the National Institute of Mental Health. Dr Freeman has also received royalties through MGH for the Massachusetts General Hospital Female Reproductive Lifecycle and Hormones Questionnaire.

None of the other planners, reviewers, and CME Institute staff for this educational activity have relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies to disclose. All relevant financial relationships have been mitigated. Dr Anderson’s and Dr Malone’s financial disclosure appears on the next page.

Credit Designation

The CME Institute of Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc., designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.5 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Note: The American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC) and the American Academy of Physician Assistants (AAPA) accept certificates of participation for educational activities certified for AMA PRA Category 1 Credit from organizations accredited by the ACCME.

Financial Disclosure

Dr Anderson has served on the speakers/advisory boards for Biogen. Dr Malone has no financial disclosures.

Review Process

The author agreed to provide a balanced and evidence-based presentation and discussed the topic and CME objective during the planning sessions. The author’s submitted content was validated by CME Institute staff, and the activity was evaluated for accuracy, use of evidence, and fair balance by a peer reviewer who is without conflict of interest.

The opinions expressed herein are those of the faculty and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the CME provider and publisher or Biogen MA Inc.

REFERENCES

1. Alzheimer’s Disease Facts and Figures. Alzheimer’s Disease and Dementia. Accessed August 15, 2022. https://www.alz.org/alzheimers-dementia/facts-figures

2. 2020 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 2020;16(3):391–460. CrossRef

3. Zarow C, Weiner MW, Ellis WG, et al. Prevalence, laterality, and comorbidity of hippocampal sclerosis in an autopsy sample. Brain Behav. 2012;2(4):435–442. PubMed CrossRef

4. Jansen WJ, Ossenkoppele R, Knol DL, et al; Amyloid Biomarker Study Group. Prevalence of cerebral amyloid pathology in persons without dementia: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2015;313(19):1924–1938. PubMed CrossRef

5. Aisen PS, Cummings J, Jack CR Jr, et al. On the path to 2025: understanding the Alzheimer’s disease continuum. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2017;9(1):60. PubMed CrossRef

6. Sperling RA, Aisen PS, Beckett LA, et al. Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(3):280–292. PubMed CrossRef

7. Petersen RC, Lopez O, Armstrong MJ, et al. Practice guideline update summary: mild cognitive impairment: report of the guideline development, dissemination, and implementation subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2018;90(3):126–135. PubMed CrossRef

8. Apostolova LG. Alzheimer Disease. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2016;22(2, Dementia):419–434. PubMed CrossRef

9. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189–198. PubMed CrossRef

10. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695–699. PubMed CrossRef

11. Julayanont P, Brousseau M, Chertkow H, et al. Montreal Cognitive Assessment Memory Index Score (MoCA-MIS) as a predictor of conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62(4):679–684. PubMed CrossRef

12. Borson S, Scanlan JM, Watanabe J, et al. Improving identification of cognitive impairment in primary care. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006;21(4):349–355. PubMed CrossRef

13. Brodaty H, Pond D, Kemp NM, et al. The GPCOG: a new screening test for dementia designed for general practice. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50(3):530–534. PubMed CrossRef

14. Tariq SH, Tumosa N, Chibnall JT, et al. Comparison of the Saint Louis University Mental Status examination and the Mini-Mental State Examination for detecting dementia and mild neurocognitive disorder: a pilot study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006;14(11):900–910. PubMed CrossRef

Volume: 84

Quick Links:

References