psychiatrist

This work may not be copied, distributed, displayed, published, reproduced, transmitted, modified, posted, sold, licensed, or used for commercial purposes. By downloading this file, you are agreeing to the publisher’s Terms & Conditions.

Original Research

Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Auditory Hallucinations Refractory to Clozapine

Marina O. Rosa, MD; Wagner F. Gattaz, MD, PhD; Moacyr A. Rosa, MD, PhD; Demetrio O. Rumi, MD, PhD; Hildeberto Tavares, MD, PhD; Martin Myczkowski, PsyD; Maria C. Sartorelli, MD; Sergio P. Rigonatti, MD, PhD; Helio Elkis, MD, PhD; Sergio B. Cabral, MD; Manoel J. Teixeira, MD, PhD; and Marco A. Marcolin, MD, PhD

Published: October 15, 2007

Article Abstract

Objective: To study the therapeutic effects on auditory hallucinations refractory to clozapine with 1-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied on the left temporoparietal cortex.

Method: Eleven patients with schizophrenia (DSM-IV) experiencing auditory hallucinations (unresponsive to clozapine) were randomly assigned to receive either active of rTMS (N = 6) or sham stimulation (N = 5) (with concomitant use of clozapine) using a double-masked, sham-controlled, parallel design. A total of 160 minutes of rTMS (9600 pulses) was administered over 10 days at 90% motor threshold. The study was conducted from January 2003 to December 2005.

Results: There was a reduction in hallucination scores in both groups, which persisted during follow-up in the active group for the items reality (p = .0493) and attentional salience (p = .0360). Both groups showed similar patterns of symptomatic changes on subscales (negative symptoms, general psychopathology) and total scores of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Clinical Global Impressions scale, and Visual Analog Scale.

Conclusion: Active rTMS in association with clozapine can be administered safely to treat auditory hallucinations, although its clinical utility is still questionable. No significant clinical effects were observed in the sample studied, possibly because it was too small and/or due to its high refractoriness.

Volume: 68

Quick Links:

Continue Reading…

Subscribe to read the entire article

$40.00

Buy this Article as a PDF

References