psychiatrist

This work may not be copied, distributed, displayed, published, reproduced, transmitted, modified, posted, sold, licensed, or used for commercial purposes. By downloading this file, you are agreeing to the publisher’s Terms & Conditions.

Case Report

Stimulant Use for Analgesia: A Case Series

Patrick J. Opperman, BS, MSa; John Derr, BSa; VaKara M. Meyer Karre, MDb; and Alëna A. Balasanova, MDb,*

Published: January 14, 2021

Case Report Header

Stimulant Use for Analgesia:

A Case Series

We present 2 unique cases identified on the addiction psychiatry consultation service in which patients utilized nonprescription stimulants as their preferred choice of analgesia. One patient smoked methamphetamine for relief of chronic back pain, while another smoked cocaine for relief of eye pain secondary to a workplace injury.

Case 1

The first patient was a 64-year-old white man with chronic back pain secondary to musculoskeletal trauma that occurred in the mid-2000s. The patient subsequently underwent back surgery for his injuries. Following surgery, he continued to have recurrent pain that, with engagement in pain management services, was adequately controlled until about a year prior to presentation. At that time, he saw a physician for increased back pain and obtained a prescription for opioid pain medication. The patient acknowledged that these medications did offer some pain relief but did not continue them long term due to limited benefit. Later, use of methamphetamine with an acquaintance led to incidental discovery that inhalation of methamphetamine delivered greater analgesia than the opioid medication had.

Six months after his physician visit for increased back pain, the patient presented to an outside hospital with altered mental status that improved with administration of naloxone; he was then transferred to our hospital for further management. Urine drug screen was positive for benzodiazepines, oxycodone, and amphetamines. When these results were discussed with him, he denied the intentional use of benzodiazepines or opioids, but noted that ingestion of these substances was possible, as he had taken a handful of unknown pills shortly before presentation to the outside hospital. He noted that, within the preceding 6-9 months, he had discontinued the use of prescription opioids and moved solely to methamphetamine use every 3-4 days to palliate his chronic back pain.

Case 2

The second patient was a 51-year-old black man with chronic right eye pain secondary to a battery explosion. This injury resulted in multiple penetrating keratoplasty procedures and aphakia of the right eye. The patient was hospitalized after presenting to the emergency department due to awakening with chest pain following cocaine use. Electrocardiogram revealed non-ST elevation myocardial infarction. He subsequently underwent a cardiac catheterization. Despite long-term management in a pain medicine clinic, the patient believed that his eye pain had been undertreated and felt cocaine helped adequately treat this pain.

Discussion

Although the patients used stimulants for separate etiologies of pain, they both reported discovering their preferred stimulant’s analgesic properties “accidentally” after exhausting numerous other pain relief options. Use of stimulants for chronic pain warrants further consideration and discussion.

Cocaine and methamphetamine have similar mechanisms of action, namely inhibiting reuptake or increasing release of monoamine neurotransmitters.1-3 One study4 found that use of intravenous cocaine provided analgesia in rats by acting on supraspinal dopamine receptors. A more recent study5 looked at prior research of using prescription drugs, such as bupropion, that inhibit uptake of monoamine neurotransmitters and provide analgesic relief for neuropathic pain by reinforcing descending inhibitory pain pathways.

In both cases, the patients sought medical care for their chronic pain but found that nonprescription stimulants provided better analgesia over prescription opioids. With regard to methamphetamine, one possible explanation for this use could be its longer half-life of 10.7 hours compared to 3-5 hours with immediate-release oxycodone.6,7 The analgesic effects of methamphetamine are speculated by similar site of action, similar receptors, and redundancy in transmitter modulation with analgesic medication.8-10 As demonstrated by Etaee et al,8 methamphetamine can potentiate the analgesic effects of opioids. If our patient started using these substances in an overlapping fashion, it may have led to the continued perception of increased analgesia from methamphetamine use. Cocaine has known use for eye analgesia, and a study11 on topical anesthetics for intravitreal injections found that cocaine was as effective in providing analgesia as lidocaine and tetracaine.

These cases highlight one of many potential reasons why patients might use illicit substances, including the perception that their pain is not being adequately managed by their prescribed medications or the discovery that nonprescription substances better manage their symptoms. The literature supports overlap in pathways and neurotransmitters, which may provide one possible explanation for psychostimulant use as a form of analgesia.

Conclusion

Both cases brought forward an interesting discussion into stimulant use for analgesia. The exact mechanism into how their pain was managed with cocaine or methamphetamine is uncertain, though research has demonstrated nonopioid analgesia utilizing similar mechanisms to these substances.

Published online: January 14, 2021.

Potential conflicts of interest: None.

Funding/support: None.

Patient consent: Both patients provided consent to publish the case reports, and information has been de-identified to protect anonymity.

REFERENCES

1.Shin EJ, Dang DK, Tran TV, et al. Current understanding of methamphetamine-associated dopaminergic neurodegeneration and psychotoxic behaviors. Arch Pharm Res. 2017;40(4):403-428. PubMed CrossRef

2.Wang KH, Penmatsa A, Gouaux E. Neurotransmitter and psychostimulant recognition by the dopamine transporter. Nature. 2015;521(7552):322-327. PubMed CrossRef

3.Lin M, Sambo D, Khoshbouei H. Methamphetamine regulation of firing activity of dopamine neurons. J Neurosci. 2016;36(40):10376-10391. PubMed CrossRef

4.Lin Y, Morrow TJ, Kiritsy-Roy JA, et al. Cocaine: evidence for supraspinal, dopamine-mediated, non-opiate analgesia. Brain Res. 1989;479(2):306-312. PubMed CrossRef

5.Bravo L, Llorca-Torralba M, Berrocoso E, et al. Monoamines as drug targets in chronic pain: focusing on neuropathic pain. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:1268. PubMed CrossRef

6.Harris DS, Boxenbaum H, Everhart ET, et al. The bioavailability of intranasal and smoked methamphetamine. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2003;74(5):475-486. PubMed

7.Ordóñez Gallego A, González Barón M, Espinosa Arranz E. Oxycodone: a pharmacological and clinical review. Clin Transl Oncol. 2007;9(5):298-307. PubMed CrossRef

8.Etaee F, Rezvani-Kamran A, Taheri M, et al. Comparing the antinociceptive effects of methamphetamine, buprenorphine, or both after chronic treatment and withdrawal in male rats. Basic Clin Neurosci. 2019;10(4):313-322. PubMed

9.Hedges DM, Obray JD, Yorgason JT, et al. Methamphetamine induces dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens through a sigma receptor-mediated pathway. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018;43(6):1405-1414. PubMed CrossRef

10.Massaly N, Morón JA, Al-Hasani R. A trigger for opioid misuse: chronic pain and stress dysregulate the mesolimbic pathway and kappa opioid system. Front Neurosci. 2016;10:480. PubMed CrossRef

11.Yau GL, Jackman CS, Hooper PL, et al. Intravitreal injection anesthesia-comparison of different topical agents: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151(2):333-7.e2. PubMed CrossRef

aCollege of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska

bDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska

*Corresponding author: Alëna A. Balasanova, MD, Department of Psychiatry, Poynter Hall 5th Floor, 985578 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-5578 ([email protected]).

Prim Care Companion CNS Disord 2021;23(1):20l02620

To cite: Opperman PJ, Derr J, Meyer Karre VM, et al. Stimulant use for analgesia: a case series. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2021;23(1):20l02620.

To share: https://doi.org/10.4088/PCC.20l02620

© Copyright 2021 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.

Related Articles

Volume: 23

Quick Links:

$40.00

Buy this Article as a PDF

References